Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Spatially and Spectrally Consistent Deep Functional Maps

About

Cycle consistency has long been exploited as a powerful prior for jointly optimizing maps within a collection of shapes. In this paper, we investigate its utility in the approaches of Deep Functional Maps, which are considered state-of-the-art in non-rigid shape matching. We first justify that under certain conditions, the learned maps, when represented in the spectral domain, are already cycle consistent. Furthermore, we identify the discrepancy that spectrally consistent maps are not necessarily spatially, or point-wise, consistent. In light of this, we present a novel design of unsupervised Deep Functional Maps, which effectively enforces the harmony of learned maps under the spectral and the point-wise representation. By taking advantage of cycle consistency, our framework produces state-of-the-art results in mapping shapes even under significant distortions. Beyond that, by independently estimating maps in both spectral and spatial domains, our method naturally alleviates over-fitting in network training, yielding superior generalization performance and accuracy within an array of challenging tests for both near-isometric and non-isometric datasets. Codes are available at https://github.com/rqhuang88/Spatiallyand-Spectrally-Consistent-Deep-Functional-Maps.

Mingze Sun, Shiwei Mao, Puhua Jiang, Maks Ovsjanikov, Ruqi Huang• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Non-isometric 3D shape matchingSMAL
Mean Geodesic Error5.4
58
Shape MatchingSHREC'19
Geodesic Error (x100)3.8
45
Shape MatchingSMAL remeshed (test)
Mean Geodesic Error (x100)9.1
20
Non-isometric Shape MatchingDT4D (test)
Mean Geometric Error7.4
14
Shape correspondence estimationFaust
Geodesic Error (Scaled)1.7
14
Shape correspondence estimationSMAL
Geodesic Error (x100)5.4
14
Shape correspondence estimationDT4D-II intra-class
Geodesic Error0.012
14
Shape correspondence estimationSCAPE
Geodesic Error (x100)2.6
14
Shape correspondence estimationDT4D inter-class II
Geodesic Error0.061
14
Raw scan matchingFSCAN (test)
Mean Geometric Error3.6
12
Showing 10 of 14 rows

Other info

Follow for update