Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Detecting and Grounding Multi-Modal Media Manipulation and Beyond

About

Misinformation has become a pressing issue. Fake media, in both visual and textual forms, is widespread on the web. While various deepfake detection and text fake news detection methods have been proposed, they are only designed for single-modality forgery based on binary classification, let alone analyzing and reasoning subtle forgery traces across different modalities. In this paper, we highlight a new research problem for multi-modal fake media, namely Detecting and Grounding Multi-Modal Media Manipulation (DGM^4). DGM^4 aims to not only detect the authenticity of multi-modal media, but also ground the manipulated content, which requires deeper reasoning of multi-modal media manipulation. To support a large-scale investigation, we construct the first DGM^4 dataset, where image-text pairs are manipulated by various approaches, with rich annotation of diverse manipulations. Moreover, we propose a novel HierArchical Multi-modal Manipulation rEasoning tRansformer (HAMMER) to fully capture the fine-grained interaction between different modalities. HAMMER performs 1) manipulation-aware contrastive learning between two uni-modal encoders as shallow manipulation reasoning, and 2) modality-aware cross-attention by multi-modal aggregator as deep manipulation reasoning. Dedicated manipulation detection and grounding heads are integrated from shallow to deep levels based on the interacted multi-modal information. To exploit more fine-grained contrastive learning for cross-modal semantic alignment, we further integrate Manipulation-Aware Contrastive Loss with Local View and construct a more advanced model HAMMER++. Finally, we build an extensive benchmark and set up rigorous evaluation metrics for this new research problem. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of HAMMER and HAMMER++.

Rui Shao, Tianxing Wu, Jianlong Wu, Liqiang Nie, Ziwei Liu• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Multi-modal manipulation detectionROM NYT domain 1.0 (test)
Accuracy82.91
23
Image GroundingDGM4 Image Sub-dataset 1.0 (test)
IoU Mean76.46
15
Multi-Label ClassificationDGM4 Entire Dataset 1.0 (test)
mAP86.41
15
Multi-modal Forgery Detection and GroundingMDSM Guardian
Accuracy80.95
14
Multi-modal Forgery Detection and GroundingMDSM USA
Accuracy75.36
14
Multi-modal Forgery Detection and GroundingMDSM (Wash.)
Accuracy76.3
14
Multi-modal Forgery Detection and GroundingMDSM NYT
Accuracy79.61
14
Multi-modal Forgery Detection and GroundingMDSM BBC
Accuracy80.12
14
Multi-modal Forgery Detection and GroundingMDSM AVG
Accuracy75.1
14
Multi-modal Manipulation Detection and GroundingDGM4 Guardian domain (test)
Accuracy79.13
13
Showing 10 of 50 rows

Other info

Follow for update