Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Similarity Contrastive Estimation for Image and Video Soft Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning

About

Contrastive representation learning has proven to be an effective self-supervised learning method for images and videos. Most successful approaches are based on Noise Contrastive Estimation (NCE) and use different views of an instance as positives that should be contrasted with other instances, called negatives, that are considered as noise. However, several instances in a dataset are drawn from the same distribution and share underlying semantic information. A good data representation should contain relations between the instances, or semantic similarity and dissimilarity, that contrastive learning harms by considering all negatives as noise. To circumvent this issue, we propose a novel formulation of contrastive learning using semantic similarity between instances called Similarity Contrastive Estimation (SCE). Our training objective is a soft contrastive one that brings the positives closer and estimates a continuous distribution to push or pull negative instances based on their learned similarities. We validate empirically our approach on both image and video representation learning. We show that SCE performs competitively with the state of the art on the ImageNet linear evaluation protocol for fewer pretraining epochs and that it generalizes to several downstream image tasks. We also show that SCE reaches state-of-the-art results for pretraining video representation and that the learned representation can generalize to video downstream tasks.

Julien Denize, Jaonary Rabarisoa, Astrid Orcesi, Romain H\'erault• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 (test)--
3518
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 (test)--
3381
Object DetectionCOCO 2017 (val)--
2843
Image ClassificationImageNet-1k (val)
Top-1 Accuracy74.1
1498
Instance SegmentationCOCO 2017 (val)--
1275
Image ClassificationFGVC-Aircraft (test)
Accuracy59.6
322
Image ClassificationStanford Cars (test)--
320
Image ClassificationSUN397 (test)
Top-1 Accuracy65.3
231
ClassificationPASCAL VOC 2007 (test)
mAP (%)88.2
217
Image ClassificationCaltech101 (test)--
204
Showing 10 of 24 rows

Other info

Follow for update