Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Disambiguated Attention Embedding for Multi-Instance Partial-Label Learning

About

In many real-world tasks, the concerned objects can be represented as a multi-instance bag associated with a candidate label set, which consists of one ground-truth label and several false positive labels. Multi-instance partial-label learning (MIPL) is a learning paradigm to deal with such tasks and has achieved favorable performances. Existing MIPL approach follows the instance-space paradigm by assigning augmented candidate label sets of bags to each instance and aggregating bag-level labels from instance-level labels. However, this scheme may be suboptimal as global bag-level information is ignored and the predicted labels of bags are sensitive to predictions of negative instances. In this paper, we study an alternative scheme where a multi-instance bag is embedded into a single vector representation. Accordingly, an intuitive algorithm named DEMIPL, i.e., Disambiguated attention Embedding for Multi-Instance Partial-Label learning, is proposed. DEMIPL employs a disambiguation attention mechanism to aggregate a multi-instance bag into a single vector representation, followed by a momentum-based disambiguation strategy to identify the ground-truth label from the candidate label set. Furthermore, we introduce a real-world MIPL dataset for colorectal cancer classification. Experimental results on benchmark and real-world datasets validate the superiority of DEMIPL against the compared MIPL and partial-label learning approaches.

Wei Tang, Weijia Zhang, Min-Ling Zhang• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Multiple Instance Learning ClassificationElephant
Accuracy96.9
26
Multiple Instance Learning ClassificationMUSK2
Accuracy96.1
26
Multiple Instance Learning ClassificationMUSK1
Accuracy96.3
26
Multiple Instance Learning ClassificationTIGER
Accuracy96.5
20
Multiple Instance Learning ClassificationFOX
Accuracy94.1
20
ClassificationBirdsong-MIPL r=3 (test)
Accuracy69.62
12
ClassificationC-SBN
Accuracy48.58
12
ClassificationC-KMeans
Accuracy52.11
12
ClassificationMNIST-MIPL r=1 (test)
Accuracy97.6
12
ClassificationFMNIST-MIPL r=1 (test)
Accuracy88.01
12
Showing 10 of 31 rows

Other info

Follow for update