Scaling for Training Time and Post-hoc Out-of-distribution Detection Enhancement
About
The capacity of a modern deep learning system to determine if a sample falls within its realm of knowledge is fundamental and important. In this paper, we offer insights and analyses of recent state-of-the-art out-of-distribution (OOD) detection methods - extremely simple activation shaping (ASH). We demonstrate that activation pruning has a detrimental effect on OOD detection, while activation scaling enhances it. Moreover, we propose SCALE, a simple yet effective post-hoc network enhancement method for OOD detection, which attains state-of-the-art OOD detection performance without compromising in-distribution (ID) accuracy. By integrating scaling concepts into the training process to capture a sample's ID characteristics, we propose Intermediate Tensor SHaping (ISH), a lightweight method for training time OOD detection enhancement. We achieve AUROC scores of +1.85\% for near-OOD and +0.74\% for far-OOD datasets on the OpenOOD v1.5 ImageNet-1K benchmark. Our code and models are available at https://github.com/kai422/SCALE.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | ImageNet-1k (val) | -- | 1469 | |
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | iNaturalist | AUROC98.02 | 219 | |
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | Places | FPR9536.86 | 142 | |
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | Texture | AUROC96.75 | 113 | |
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | ImageNet | FPR9544.8 | 108 | |
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | OpenImage-O | AUROC94 | 107 | |
| Near-OOD Detection | CIFAR-100 Near-OOD (test) | AUROC80.99 | 93 | |
| Image Classification | ImageNet-1K | Accuracy76.18 | 92 | |
| OOD Detection | CIFAR-10 | FPR@9512.57 | 85 | |
| OOD Detection | SVHN (test) | AUROC0.8491 | 84 |