Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

The Dawn of LMMs: Preliminary Explorations with GPT-4V(ision)

About

Large multimodal models (LMMs) extend large language models (LLMs) with multi-sensory skills, such as visual understanding, to achieve stronger generic intelligence. In this paper, we analyze the latest model, GPT-4V(ision), to deepen the understanding of LMMs. The analysis focuses on the intriguing tasks that GPT-4V can perform, containing test samples to probe the quality and genericity of GPT-4V's capabilities, its supported inputs and working modes, and the effective ways to prompt the model. In our approach to exploring GPT-4V, we curate and organize a collection of carefully designed qualitative samples spanning a variety of domains and tasks. Observations from these samples demonstrate that GPT-4V's unprecedented ability in processing arbitrarily interleaved multimodal inputs and the genericity of its capabilities together make GPT-4V a powerful multimodal generalist system. Furthermore, GPT-4V's unique capability of understanding visual markers drawn on input images can give rise to new human-computer interaction methods such as visual referring prompting. We conclude the report with in-depth discussions on the emerging application scenarios and the future research directions for GPT-4V-based systems. We hope that this preliminary exploration will inspire future research on the next-generation multimodal task formulation, new ways to exploit and enhance LMMs to solve real-world problems, and gaining better understanding of multimodal foundation models. Finally, we acknowledge that the model under our study is solely the product of OpenAI's innovative work, and they should be fully credited for its development. Please see the GPT-4V contributions paper for the authorship and credit attribution: https://cdn.openai.com/contributions/gpt-4v.pdf

Zhengyuan Yang, Linjie Li, Kevin Lin, Jianfeng Wang, Chung-Ching Lin, Zicheng Liu, Lijuan Wang• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Hallucination and Visual Reasoning EvaluationHallusionBench
Accuracy (aACC)62.1
40
Image RetrievalIMAGECODE Video subset (test)
Accuracy22
20
Fake News Video DetectionFakeTT
Average Accuracy58.69
18
Optimal Asset SelectionMETASCENES 1.0 (test)
Top-1 Acc16.5
14
Multimodal Capability EvaluationMMStar
CP Score69.6
11
General Multimodal PerformancePOPE, HallusionBench, MMStar Average
Overall Score60.6
11
Object Hallucination DetectionPOPE
Accuracy83.9
11
Robotic ManipulationReal-world Manipulation SO-100
Place Success Rate50
10
Embodied Question AnsweringA-EQA 1.0 (test)
LLM-Match41.8
10
X-ray understandingMIMIC-CXR uncertain as positive
Micro F1 (14 classes)35.6
9
Showing 10 of 17 rows

Other info

Follow for update