Microscaling Data Formats for Deep Learning
About
Narrow bit-width data formats are key to reducing the computational and storage costs of modern deep learning applications. This paper evaluates Microscaling (MX) data formats that combine a per-block scaling factor with narrow floating-point and integer types for individual elements. MX formats balance the competing needs of hardware efficiency, model accuracy, and user friction. Empirical results on over two dozen benchmarks demonstrate practicality of MX data formats as a drop-in replacement for baseline FP32 for AI inference and training with low user friction. We also show the first instance of training generative language models at sub-8-bit weights, activations, and gradients with minimal accuracy loss and no modifications to the training recipe.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Language Modeling | C4 | Perplexity15.49 | 1688 | |
| Language Understanding | MMLU | Accuracy66.16 | 844 | |
| Language Modeling | WikiText | PPL9.75 | 740 | |
| Long-context language modeling | LongBench | Average Score35.14 | 328 | |
| Language Model Evaluation | Winogrande, ARC-C, ARC-E, Lambada, PIQA, Hellaswag, MMLU, IFEval, and GSM8K-CoT (Mixed standard 10-shot prompt) | Accuracy80.37 | 88 | |
| Language Modeling | WikiText-103 | PPL3.69 | 42 | |
| Zero-shot Language Modeling | LM Evaluation Harness 0-shot | WG76.32 | 30 | |
| LLM Inference Performance | Llama-3-8B | TTFT (ms)56.03 | 12 | |
| Quantization Distribution Evaluation | C4 (calibration set) | KL Divergence (Top 10)0.0543 | 11 | |
| Quantization Distribution Evaluation | Wiki2 (calibration set) | KL Divergence0.1143 | 11 |