Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

An LLM can Fool Itself: A Prompt-Based Adversarial Attack

About

The wide-ranging applications of large language models (LLMs), especially in safety-critical domains, necessitate the proper evaluation of the LLM's adversarial robustness. This paper proposes an efficient tool to audit the LLM's adversarial robustness via a prompt-based adversarial attack (PromptAttack). PromptAttack converts adversarial textual attacks into an attack prompt that can cause the victim LLM to output the adversarial sample to fool itself. The attack prompt is composed of three important components: (1) original input (OI) including the original sample and its ground-truth label, (2) attack objective (AO) illustrating a task description of generating a new sample that can fool itself without changing the semantic meaning, and (3) attack guidance (AG) containing the perturbation instructions to guide the LLM on how to complete the task by perturbing the original sample at character, word, and sentence levels, respectively. Besides, we use a fidelity filter to ensure that PromptAttack maintains the original semantic meanings of the adversarial examples. Further, we enhance the attack power of PromptAttack by ensembling adversarial examples at different perturbation levels. Comprehensive empirical results using Llama2 and GPT-3.5 validate that PromptAttack consistently yields a much higher attack success rate compared to AdvGLUE and AdvGLUE++. Interesting findings include that a simple emoji can easily mislead GPT-3.5 to make wrong predictions.

Xilie Xu, Keyi Kong, Ning Liu, Lizhen Cui, Di Wang, Jingfeng Zhang, Mohan Kankanhalli• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Adversarial Evasion AttackMGTBench Reuters
ASR0.55
24
Adversarial Evasion AttackMGTBench Essay
ASR0.53
24
Adversarial Evasion AttackMGTBench WP
ASR0.35
24
Adversarial Evasion AttackMGT Academic STEM
ASR1
22
Adversarial Evasion AttackMGT-Academic Humanity
ASR0.83
22
Adversarial Evasion AttackMGT-Academic Social Science
Attack Success Rate (ASR)0.86
22
Showing 6 of 6 rows

Other info

Follow for update