Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

DDCoT: Duty-Distinct Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Multimodal Reasoning in Language Models

About

A long-standing goal of AI systems is to perform complex multimodal reasoning like humans. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have made remarkable strides in such multi-step reasoning on the language modality solely by leveraging the chain of thought (CoT) to mimic human thinking. However, the transfer of these advancements to multimodal contexts introduces heightened challenges, including but not limited to the impractical need for labor-intensive annotation and the limitations in terms of flexibility, generalizability, and explainability. To evoke CoT reasoning in multimodality, this work first conducts an in-depth analysis of these challenges posed by multimodality and presents two key insights: "keeping critical thinking" and "letting everyone do their jobs" in multimodal CoT reasoning. Furthermore, this study proposes a novel DDCoT prompting that maintains a critical attitude through negative-space prompting and incorporates multimodality into reasoning by first dividing the reasoning responsibility of LLMs into reasoning and recognition and then integrating the visual recognition capability of visual models into the joint reasoning process. The rationales generated by DDCoT not only improve the reasoning abilities of both large and small language models in zero-shot prompting and fine-tuning learning, significantly outperforming state-of-the-art methods but also exhibit impressive generalizability and explainability.

Ge Zheng, Bin Yang, Jiajin Tang, Hong-Yu Zhou, Sibei Yang• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Science Question AnsweringScienceQA
IMG Score0.8334
49
Multimodal Science Question AnsweringScienceQA
Overall Average Score80.15
36
Multimodal ReasoningSEED-Bench Image
Score58
32
Geometry Problem SolvingG-MATH
Accuracy29.95
8
Meme CaptioningMemeCap
BLEU-44.9
8
Visual Question AnsweringDeepEval
ACC49.2
8
Visual Question AnsweringCII-Bench
Accuracy35.3
8
Molecular property predictionMUTAG
Accuracy73.08
8
Visual Question AnsweringNewYorker
Accuracy29.4
8
Chess positional advantage predictionChessAdv
Accuracy37.7
8
Showing 10 of 14 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update