Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

A Unified Algebraic Perspective on Lipschitz Neural Networks

About

Important research efforts have focused on the design and training of neural networks with a controlled Lipschitz constant. The goal is to increase and sometimes guarantee the robustness against adversarial attacks. Recent promising techniques draw inspirations from different backgrounds to design 1-Lipschitz neural networks, just to name a few: convex potential layers derive from the discretization of continuous dynamical systems, Almost-Orthogonal-Layer proposes a tailored method for matrix rescaling. However, it is today important to consider the recent and promising contributions in the field under a common theoretical lens to better design new and improved layers. This paper introduces a novel algebraic perspective unifying various types of 1-Lipschitz neural networks, including the ones previously mentioned, along with methods based on orthogonality and spectral methods. Interestingly, we show that many existing techniques can be derived and generalized via finding analytical solutions of a common semidefinite programming (SDP) condition. We also prove that AOL biases the scaled weight to the ones which are close to the set of orthogonal matrices in a certain mathematical manner. Moreover, our algebraic condition, combined with the Gershgorin circle theorem, readily leads to new and diverse parameterizations for 1-Lipschitz network layers. Our approach, called SDP-based Lipschitz Layers (SLL), allows us to design non-trivial yet efficient generalization of convex potential layers. Finally, the comprehensive set of experiments on image classification shows that SLLs outperform previous approaches on certified robust accuracy. Code is available at https://github.com/araujoalexandre/Lipschitz-SLL-Networks.

Alexandre Araujo, Aaron Havens, Blaise Delattre, Alexandre Allauzen, Bin Hu• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationTinyImageNet (test)
Vanilla Accuracy32.1
14
Image ClassificationCIFAR10 (test)
Accuracy0.733
11
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 (test)
Clean Accuracy0.478
11
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 (test)
Clean Accuracy73.3
10
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 (test)
Clean Accuracy73.3
10
Image ClassificationCIFAR100 (test)
Natural Accuracy0.465
9
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10
Clean Accuracy85.6
9
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100
Clean Accuracy59.4
9
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 (test)
Clean Accuracy46.5
8
Certified AccuracyUCI radius 255/255 overall comparison
Average Rank3.31
6
Showing 10 of 18 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update