Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Models

About

Transfer learning - i.e., further fine-tuning a pre-trained model on a downstream task - can confer significant advantages, including improved downstream performance, faster convergence, and better sample efficiency. These advantages have led to a proliferation of task-specific fine-tuned models, which typically can only perform a single task and do not benefit from one another. Recently, model merging techniques have emerged as a solution to combine multiple task-specific models into a single multitask model without performing additional training. However, existing merging methods often ignore the interference between parameters of different models, resulting in large performance drops when merging multiple models. In this paper, we demonstrate that prior merging techniques inadvertently lose valuable information due to two major sources of interference: (a) interference due to redundant parameter values and (b) disagreement on the sign of a given parameter's values across models. To address this, we propose our method, TRIM, ELECT SIGN & MERGE (TIES-Merging), which introduces three novel steps when merging models: (1) resetting parameters that only changed a small amount during fine-tuning, (2) resolving sign conflicts, and (3) merging only the parameters that are in alignment with the final agreed-upon sign. We find that TIES-Merging outperforms several existing methods in diverse settings covering a range of modalities, domains, number of tasks, model sizes, architectures, and fine-tuning settings. We further analyze the impact of different types of interference on model parameters, and highlight the importance of resolving sign interference. Our code is available at https://github.com/prateeky2806/ties-merging

Prateek Yadav, Derek Tam, Leshem Choshen, Colin Raffel, Mohit Bansal• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Visual Question AnsweringVQA v2
Accuracy67.17
1165
Mathematical ReasoningGSM8K
Accuracy65.58
983
Visual Question AnsweringGQA
Accuracy57.55
963
Code GenerationHumanEval
Pass@185.67
850
Mathematical ReasoningGSM8K (test)
Accuracy57.54
797
Commonsense ReasoningWinoGrande
Accuracy77.9
776
Mathematical ReasoningMATH
Accuracy17.45
643
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100--
622
Multimodal EvaluationMME
Score62.14
557
Image ClassificationEuroSAT
Accuracy94.37
497
Showing 10 of 300 rows
...

Other info

Follow for update