AlberDICE: Addressing Out-Of-Distribution Joint Actions in Offline Multi-Agent RL via Alternating Stationary Distribution Correction Estimation
About
One of the main challenges in offline Reinforcement Learning (RL) is the distribution shift that arises from the learned policy deviating from the data collection policy. This is often addressed by avoiding out-of-distribution (OOD) actions during policy improvement as their presence can lead to substantial performance degradation. This challenge is amplified in the offline Multi-Agent RL (MARL) setting since the joint action space grows exponentially with the number of agents. To avoid this curse of dimensionality, existing MARL methods adopt either value decomposition methods or fully decentralized training of individual agents. However, even when combined with standard conservatism principles, these methods can still result in the selection of OOD joint actions in offline MARL. To this end, we introduce AlberDICE, an offline MARL algorithm that alternatively performs centralized training of individual agents based on stationary distribution optimization. AlberDICE circumvents the exponential complexity of MARL by computing the best response of one agent at a time while effectively avoiding OOD joint action selection. Theoretically, we show that the alternating optimization procedure converges to Nash policies. In the experiments, we demonstrate that AlberDICE significantly outperforms baseline algorithms on a standard suite of MARL benchmarks.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning | SMAC 3s5z Hard | Mean Success Rate47 | 6 | |
| Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning | SMAC 5m_vs_6m Hard | Mean Success Rate0.24 | 6 | |
| Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning | SMAC Corridor (SH) | Mean Success Rate98 | 6 | |
| Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning | SMAC 6hvs8z SH | Mean Success Rate21 | 6 | |
| Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning | SMAC 8m_vs_9m Hard | Mean Success Rate0.67 | 6 | |
| Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning | SMAC 3s5z_vs_3s6z (SH) | Mean Success Rate63 | 6 | |
| Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning | Google Research Football (GRF) RPS (test) | Mean Success Rate75 | 6 | |
| Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning | Google Research Football (GRF) CA-Hard (test) | Mean Success Rate0.83 | 6 | |
| Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning | Google Research Football (GRF) Corner (test) | Mean Success Rate36 | 6 | |
| Offline Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning | Bridge Optimal | Mean Return-1.27 | 6 |