Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Long-Tailed Learning as Multi-Objective Optimization

About

Real-world data is extremely imbalanced and presents a long-tailed distribution, resulting in models that are biased towards classes with sufficient samples and perform poorly on rare classes. Recent methods propose to rebalance classes but they undertake the seesaw dilemma (what is increasing performance on tail classes may decrease that of head classes, and vice versa). In this paper, we argue that the seesaw dilemma is derived from gradient imbalance of different classes, in which gradients of inappropriate classes are set to important for updating, thus are prone to overcompensation or undercompensation on tail classes. To achieve ideal compensation, we formulate the long-tailed recognition as an multi-objective optimization problem, which fairly respects the contributions of head and tail classes simultaneously. For efficiency, we propose a Gradient-Balancing Grouping (GBG) strategy to gather the classes with similar gradient directions, thus approximately make every update under a Pareto descent direction. Our GBG method drives classes with similar gradient directions to form more representative gradient and provide ideal compensation to the tail classes. Moreover, We conduct extensive experiments on commonly used benchmarks in long-tailed learning and demonstrate the superiority of our method over existing SOTA methods.

Weiqi Li, Fan Lyu, Fanhua Shang, Liang Wan, Wei Feng• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationImageNet LT
Top-1 Accuracy58.7
264
Image ClassificationiNaturalist 2018 (test)
Top-1 Accuracy71.9
207
Image ClassificationImageNet-LT (test)--
159
Multi-Label ClassificationPASCAL VOC 2007 (test)
mAP89
125
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10-LT (IF 50)
Top-1 Accuracy87.7
48
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 LT (IF=50)
Top-1 Acc57.2
42
Multi-Label ClassificationCOCO 2014 (test)
mAP71.1
31
Image ClassificationCIFAR100 LT (r=100)
Top-1 Accuracy52.3
22
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10-LT
Top-1 Accuracy85.1
17
Multi-Label ClassificationYeast (test)
Micro-F175.5
15
Showing 10 of 11 rows

Other info

Follow for update