Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

ExCeL : Combined Extreme and Collective Logit Information for Enhancing Out-of-Distribution Detection

About

Deep learning models often exhibit overconfidence in predicting out-of-distribution (OOD) data, underscoring the crucial role of OOD detection in ensuring reliability in predictions. Among various OOD detection approaches, post-hoc detectors have gained significant popularity, primarily due to their ease of use and implementation. However, the effectiveness of most post-hoc OOD detectors has been constrained as they rely solely either on extreme information, such as the maximum logit, or on the collective information (i.e., information spanned across classes or training samples) embedded within the output layer. In this paper, we propose ExCeL that combines both extreme and collective information within the output layer for enhanced accuracy in OOD detection. We leverage the logit of the top predicted class as the extreme information (i.e., the maximum logit), while the collective information is derived in a novel approach that involves assessing the likelihood of other classes appearing in subsequent ranks across various training samples. Our idea is motivated by the observation that, for in-distribution (ID) data, the ranking of classes beyond the predicted class is more deterministic compared to that in OOD data. Experiments conducted on CIFAR100 and ImageNet-200 datasets demonstrate that ExCeL consistently is among the five top-performing methods out of twenty-one existing post-hoc baselines when the joint performance on near-OOD and far-OOD is considered (i.e., in terms of AUROC and FPR95). Furthermore, ExCeL shows the best overall performance across both datasets, unlike other baselines that work best on one dataset but has a performance drop in the other.

Naveen Karunanayake, Suranga Seneviratne, Sanjay Chawla• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Near-OOD DetectionCIFAR-100 Near-OOD (test)
AUROC80.7
93
OOD DetectionCIFAR-10
FPR@9540.03
85
Near-OOD DetectionCIFAR-10
AUROC86.89
71
OOD DetectionCIFAR100 Dfar
AUROC82.04
69
Near-OOD DetectionImageNet-200
AUROC82.4
36
Far OOD detectionAverage (CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, TinyImageNet)
AUROC88.57
35
Near-OOD DetectionCIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, TinyImageNet Average
AUROC83.33
35
Far OOD detectionTinyImageNet
AUROC91.97
34
Near-OOD DetectionTinyImageNet
AUROC82.4
34
OOD DetectionCIFAR-10
FPR@9540.03
32
Showing 10 of 13 rows

Other info

Follow for update