Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Multiple Instance Learning Framework with Masked Hard Instance Mining for Whole Slide Image Classification

About

The whole slide image (WSI) classification is often formulated as a multiple instance learning (MIL) problem. Since the positive tissue is only a small fraction of the gigapixel WSI, existing MIL methods intuitively focus on identifying salient instances via attention mechanisms. However, this leads to a bias towards easy-to-classify instances while neglecting hard-to-classify instances. Some literature has revealed that hard examples are beneficial for modeling a discriminative boundary accurately. By applying such an idea at the instance level, we elaborate a novel MIL framework with masked hard instance mining (MHIM-MIL), which uses a Siamese structure (Teacher-Student) with a consistency constraint to explore the potential hard instances. With several instance masking strategies based on attention scores, MHIM-MIL employs a momentum teacher to implicitly mine hard instances for training the student model, which can be any attention-based MIL model. This counter-intuitive strategy essentially enables the student to learn a better discriminating boundary. Moreover, the student is used to update the teacher with an exponential moving average (EMA), which in turn identifies new hard instances for subsequent training iterations and stabilizes the optimization. Experimental results on the CAMELYON-16 and TCGA Lung Cancer datasets demonstrate that MHIM-MIL outperforms other latest methods in terms of performance and training cost. The code is available at: https://github.com/DearCaat/MHIM-MIL.

Wenhao Tang, Sheng Huang, Xiaoxian Zhang, Fengtao Zhou, Yi Zhang, Bo Liu• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Whole Slide Image classificationCAMELYON16 (test)
AUC0.984
163
Survival PredictionTCGA-BLCA
C-index0.661
94
ClassificationCRC-KRAS TCGA cohort
AUC69.7
84
Diagnostic ClassificationBRACS-7
AUC0.871
81
ClassificationCAMELYON16 (test)
AUC97.2
69
WSI ClassificationTCGA lung cancer dataset (test)
Accuracy92.17
67
Survival PredictionBLCA
C-Index0.6092
66
WSI ClassificationBRACS (test)
Mean AUC0.862
54
WSI ClassificationBCNB-HER2
Accuracy62.1
54
Cancer SubtypingTCGA-NLCSC (test)
Accuracy91.74
53
Showing 10 of 39 rows

Other info

Follow for update