Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

First Session Adaptation: A Strong Replay-Free Baseline for Class-Incremental Learning

About

In Class-Incremental Learning (CIL) an image classification system is exposed to new classes in each learning session and must be updated incrementally. Methods approaching this problem have updated both the classification head and the feature extractor body at each session of CIL. In this work, we develop a baseline method, First Session Adaptation (FSA), that sheds light on the efficacy of existing CIL approaches and allows us to assess the relative performance contributions from head and body adaption. FSA adapts a pre-trained neural network body only on the first learning session and fixes it thereafter; a head based on linear discriminant analysis (LDA), is then placed on top of the adapted body, allowing exact updates through CIL. FSA is replay-free i.e.~it does not memorize examples from previous sessions of continual learning. To empirically motivate FSA, we first consider a diverse selection of 22 image-classification datasets, evaluating different heads and body adaptation techniques in high/low-shot offline settings. We find that the LDA head performs well and supports CIL out-of-the-box. We also find that Featurewise Layer Modulation (FiLM) adapters are highly effective in the few-shot setting, and full-body adaption in the high-shot setting. Second, we empirically investigate various CIL settings including high-shot CIL and few-shot CIL, including settings that have previously been used in the literature. We show that FSA significantly improves over the state-of-the-art in 15 of the 16 settings considered. FSA with FiLM adapters is especially performant in the few-shot setting. These results indicate that current approaches to continuous body adaptation are not working as expected. Finally, we propose a measure that can be applied to a set of unlabelled inputs which is predictive of the benefits of body adaptation.

Aristeidis Panos, Yuriko Kobe, Daniel Olmeda Reino, Rahaf Aljundi, Richard E. Turner• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Class-incremental learningImageNet-R
Average Accuracy73.6
103
Class-incremental learningImageNet A
Average Accuracy45.7
86
Class-incremental learningCIFAR-100 10 (test)
Average Top-1 Accuracy84.6
75
Class-incremental learningCIFAR-100
Average Accuracy87
60
Class-incremental learningCUB
Avg Accuracy69.7
45
Class-incremental learningImageNet-R 10-task
FAA72.4
44
Domain-incremental learningCORe50 (test)
Test Accuracy78.3
34
Domain-incremental learningCDDB Hard (test)
Average Accuracy61.3
25
Class-incremental learningStanford Cars CIL, T=10 (test)
Avg Accuracy38.2
23
Class-incremental learningOmniBenchmark
Avg Accuracy67.1
17
Showing 10 of 15 rows

Other info

Follow for update