A Scalable Neural Network for DSIC Affine Maximizer Auction Design
About
Automated auction design aims to find empirically high-revenue mechanisms through machine learning. Existing works on multi item auction scenarios can be roughly divided into RegretNet-like and affine maximizer auctions (AMAs) approaches. However, the former cannot strictly ensure dominant strategy incentive compatibility (DSIC), while the latter faces scalability issue due to the large number of allocation candidates. To address these limitations, we propose AMenuNet, a scalable neural network that constructs the AMA parameters (even including the allocation menu) from bidder and item representations. AMenuNet is always DSIC and individually rational (IR) due to the properties of AMAs, and it enhances scalability by generating candidate allocations through a neural network. Additionally, AMenuNet is permutation equivariant, and its number of parameters is independent of auction scale. We conduct extensive experiments to demonstrate that AMenuNet outperforms strong baselines in both contextual and non-contextual multi-item auctions, scales well to larger auctions, generalizes well to different settings, and identifies useful deterministic allocations. Overall, our proposed approach offers an effective solution to automated DSIC auction design, with improved scalability and strong revenue performance in various settings.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Optimal Auction Design | 3x10 auction setting | Revenue5.5896 | 15 | |
| Optimal Auction Design | 2x5 auction setting | Revenue2.2768 | 15 | |
| Auction Revenue Maximization | Classic auction Setting (F) 1x2 | Average Revenue17.01 | 7 | |
| Auction Revenue Maximization | Classic auction Setting (D) 3x1 | Average Revenue2.7382 | 7 | |
| Auction Revenue Maximization | Classic auction Setting (E) 1x2 | Avg Revenue9.6219 | 7 | |
| Auction Revenue Maximization | Classic auction Setting (C) 5x5 | Avg Revenue3.3916 | 6 | |
| Contextual Auction | Setting (A) 3x2 | Average Revenue56.01 | 4 | |
| Contextual Auction | Setting (A) 2x2 1.0 (test) | Average Revenue0.4398 | 4 | |
| Contextual Auction | Setting (A) 2x5 | Average Revenue1.1539 | 4 | |
| Contextual Auction | Setting (A) 2x10 | Average Revenue2.3935 | 4 |