Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Multimodal Visual-Tactile Representation Learning through Self-Supervised Contrastive Pre-Training

About

The rapidly evolving field of robotics necessitates methods that can facilitate the fusion of multiple modalities. Specifically, when it comes to interacting with tangible objects, effectively combining visual and tactile sensory data is key to understanding and navigating the complex dynamics of the physical world, enabling a more nuanced and adaptable response to changing environments. Nevertheless, much of the earlier work in merging these two sensory modalities has relied on supervised methods utilizing datasets labeled by humans.This paper introduces MViTac, a novel methodology that leverages contrastive learning to integrate vision and touch sensations in a self-supervised fashion. By availing both sensory inputs, MViTac leverages intra and inter-modality losses for learning representations, resulting in enhanced material property classification and more adept grasping prediction. Through a series of experiments, we showcase the effectiveness of our method and its superiority over existing state-of-the-art self-supervised and supervised techniques. In evaluating our methodology, we focus on two distinct tasks: material classification and grasping success prediction. Our results indicate that MViTac facilitates the development of improved modality encoders, yielding more robust representations as evidenced by linear probing assessments.

Vedant Dave, Fotios Lygerakis, Elmar Rueckert• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Grasp Success PredictionGrasp dataset
Accuracy60.7
22
Tactile RecognitionTactile Cross-Domain OF Real to X Unseen target domains
Average ACC48.3
22
InsertionSimulation
Insertion Success Rate64.3
14
Tactile RecognitionTAG→OF-Real (test)
Accuracy50.2
12
Material Property RecognitionTAG (Touch-and-Go)
Category Accuracy (top-1)74.9
10
Object IdentificationObject Folder Real
Top-1 Accuracy82.3
10
LiftSimulation
Success Rate97.9
7
DoorSimulation
Success Rate1
7
Egg RotateSimulation
Success Rate71.6
7
LiftSimulation Cylinder Shape
Success Rate76.7
7
Showing 10 of 19 rows

Other info

Follow for update