Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Towards Building the Federated GPT: Federated Instruction Tuning

About

While "instruction-tuned" generative large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated an impressive ability to generalize to new tasks, the training phases heavily rely on large amounts of diverse and high-quality instruction data (such as ChatGPT and GPT-4). Unfortunately, acquiring high-quality data, especially when it comes to human-written data, can pose significant challenges both in terms of cost and accessibility. Moreover, concerns related to privacy can further limit access to such data, making the process of obtaining it a complex and nuanced undertaking. Consequently, this hinders the generality of the tuned models and may restrict their effectiveness in certain contexts. To tackle this issue, our study introduces a new approach called Federated Instruction Tuning (FedIT), which leverages federated learning (FL) as the learning framework for the instruction tuning of LLMs. This marks the first exploration of FL-based instruction tuning for LLMs. This is especially important since text data is predominantly generated by end users. Therefore, it is imperative to design and adapt FL approaches to effectively leverage these users' diverse instructions stored on local devices, while preserving privacy and ensuring data security. In the current paper, by conducting widely used GPT-4 auto-evaluation, we demonstrate that by exploiting the heterogeneous and diverse sets of instructions on the client's end with the proposed framework FedIT, we improved the performance of LLMs compared to centralized training with only limited local instructions. Further, in this paper, we developed a Github repository named Shepherd. This repository offers a foundational framework for exploring federated fine-tuning of LLMs using heterogeneous instructions across diverse categories.

Jianyi Zhang, Saeed Vahidian, Martin Kuo, Chunyuan Li, Ruiyi Zhang, Tong Yu, Yufan Zhou, Guoyin Wang, Yiran Chen• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Multi-hop Question Answering2WikiMultihopQA--
387
Multi-hop Question AnsweringHotpotQA--
294
Image ClassificationDomainNet
Accuracy (ClipArt)88.6
206
Math ReasoningGSM8K (test)
Accuracy10.72
192
Commonsense ReasoningCommonsense Reasoning (BoolQ, PIQA, SIQA, HellaS., WinoG., ARC-e, ARC-c, OBQA)
BoolQ Accuracy82.1
129
Question AnsweringPopQA--
88
Question AnsweringSQuAD v1.1
F189.53
79
Commonsense ReasoningCommonsense Reasoning Suite (test)
HellaSwag Accuracy0.6493
62
Paraphrase DetectionQQP (test)
Accuracy87.89
51
Web-based Agent InteractionWebShop (test)
Success Rate67.5
42
Showing 10 of 82 rows
...

Other info

Follow for update