Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Cumulative Distribution Function based General Temporal Point Processes

About

Temporal Point Processes (TPPs) hold a pivotal role in modeling event sequences across diverse domains, including social networking and e-commerce, and have significantly contributed to the advancement of recommendation systems and information retrieval strategies. Through the analysis of events such as user interactions and transactions, TPPs offer valuable insights into behavioral patterns, facilitating the prediction of future trends. However, accurately forecasting future events remains a formidable challenge due to the intricate nature of these patterns. The integration of Neural Networks with TPPs has ushered in the development of advanced deep TPP models. While these models excel at processing complex and nonlinear temporal data, they encounter limitations in modeling intensity functions, grapple with computational complexities in integral computations, and struggle to capture long-range temporal dependencies effectively. In this study, we introduce the CuFun model, representing a novel approach to TPPs that revolves around the Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF). CuFun stands out by uniquely employing a monotonic neural network for CDF representation, utilizing past events as a scaling factor. This innovation significantly bolsters the model's adaptability and precision across a wide range of data scenarios. Our approach addresses several critical issues inherent in traditional TPP modeling: it simplifies log-likelihood calculations, extends applicability beyond predefined density function forms, and adeptly captures long-range temporal patterns. Our contributions encompass the introduction of a pioneering CDF-based TPP model, the development of a methodology for incorporating past event information into future event prediction, and empirical validation of CuFun's effectiveness through extensive experimentation on synthetic and real-world datasets.

Maolin Wang, Yu Pan, Zenglin Xu, Ruocheng Guo, Xiangyu Zhao, Wanyu Wang, Yiqi Wang, Zitao Liu, Langming Liu• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Temporal Point Process modelingHawkes1 synthetic (test)
Negative Log-Likelihood-1.488
25
Temporal Point Process modelingHawkes2 synthetic (test)
NLL-1.543
25
Univariate Temporal Point Process modelingSelf-correcting synthetic (test)
Negative Log-Likelihood (NLL)-1.41
14
Univariate Temporal Point Process modelingRenewal1 synthetic (test)
NLL-1.844
14
Univariate Temporal Point Process modelingRenewal2 synthetic (test)
NLL-1.454
14
Multivariate Temporal Point ProcessEarthquake
NLL0.23
10
Multivariate Temporal Point ProcessRetweet
NLL-0.462
10
Multivariate Temporal Point ProcessTaobao
NLL-0.878
10
Multivariate Temporal Point Processtaxi
NLL-0.273
10
Showing 9 of 9 rows

Other info

Follow for update