Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Rethinking the Expressive Power of GNNs via Graph Biconnectivity

About

Designing expressive Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) is a central topic in learning graph-structured data. While numerous approaches have been proposed to improve GNNs in terms of the Weisfeiler-Lehman (WL) test, generally there is still a lack of deep understanding of what additional power they can systematically and provably gain. In this paper, we take a fundamentally different perspective to study the expressive power of GNNs beyond the WL test. Specifically, we introduce a novel class of expressivity metrics via graph biconnectivity and highlight their importance in both theory and practice. As biconnectivity can be easily calculated using simple algorithms that have linear computational costs, it is natural to expect that popular GNNs can learn it easily as well. However, after a thorough review of prior GNN architectures, we surprisingly find that most of them are not expressive for any of these metrics. The only exception is the ESAN framework, for which we give a theoretical justification of its power. We proceed to introduce a principled and more efficient approach, called the Generalized Distance Weisfeiler-Lehman (GD-WL), which is provably expressive for all biconnectivity metrics. Practically, we show GD-WL can be implemented by a Transformer-like architecture that preserves expressiveness and enjoys full parallelizability. A set of experiments on both synthetic and real datasets demonstrates that our approach can consistently outperform prior GNN architectures.

Bohang Zhang, Shengjie Luo, Liwei Wang, Di He• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Graph RegressionZINC (test)
MAE0.081
204
Graph RegressionZINC 12K (test)
MAE0.081
164
Graph ClassificationCIFAR10 (test)
Test Accuracy68.702
139
Node ClassificationCLUSTER (test)
Test Accuracy79.232
113
Graph ClassificationMNIST (test)
Accuracy98.173
110
Graph RegressionZINC
MAE0.081
96
Node ClassificationPATTERN (test)
Test Accuracy86.821
88
Graph RegressionZINC subset (test)
MAE0.081
56
Graph-level regressionZINC full (test)
MAE0.025
45
Graph property detectionTree Small synthetic (test)
F1 Score98
17
Showing 10 of 25 rows

Other info

Follow for update