NECO: NEural Collapse Based Out-of-distribution detection
About
Detecting out-of-distribution (OOD) data is a critical challenge in machine learning due to model overconfidence, often without awareness of their epistemological limits. We hypothesize that ``neural collapse'', a phenomenon affecting in-distribution data for models trained beyond loss convergence, also influences OOD data. To benefit from this interplay, we introduce NECO, a novel post-hoc method for OOD detection, which leverages the geometric properties of ``neural collapse'' and of principal component spaces to identify OOD data. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that NECO achieves state-of-the-art results on both small and large-scale OOD detection tasks while exhibiting strong generalization capabilities across different network architectures. Furthermore, we provide a theoretical explanation for the effectiveness of our method in OOD detection. Code is available at https://gitlab.com/drti/neco
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | CIFAR-10 ID CIFAR-100 OOD | AUC86.56 | 66 | |
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | CIFAR10 (ID) vs SVHN (OOD) | AUROC96.14 | 61 | |
| OOD Detection | ImageNet-1k ID Places OOD | AUROC81.02 | 59 | |
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | CIFAR100 (in) CIFAR10 (out) | AUROC77.12 | 57 | |
| OOD Detection | ImageNet-1k ID iNaturalist OOD | AUROC90.3 | 43 | |
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | ImageNet-1k (ID) vs Textures (OOD) | AUROC84.19 | 43 | |
| OOD Detection | ImageNet OOD Average (iNaturalist, SUN, Places, Textures) | Mean FPR95 (OOD Avg)53.69 | 33 | |
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | CIFAR100 (ID) SVHN (OOD) | AUROC83.85 | 28 | |
| OOD Detection | GastroVision | AUROC79.81 | 24 | |
| OOD Detection | ImageNet-1k (ID) vs SUN (OOD) | AUROC83.17 | 24 |