Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Adversarial AutoMixup

About

Data mixing augmentation has been widely applied to improve the generalization ability of deep neural networks. Recently, offline data mixing augmentation, e.g. handcrafted and saliency information-based mixup, has been gradually replaced by automatic mixing approaches. Through minimizing two sub-tasks, namely, mixed sample generation and mixup classification in an end-to-end way, AutoMix significantly improves accuracy on image classification tasks. However, as the optimization objective is consistent for the two sub-tasks, this approach is prone to generating consistent instead of diverse mixed samples, which results in overfitting for target task training. In this paper, we propose AdAutomixup, an adversarial automatic mixup augmentation approach that generates challenging samples to train a robust classifier for image classification, by alternatively optimizing the classifier and the mixup sample generator. AdAutomixup comprises two modules, a mixed example generator, and a target classifier. The mixed sample generator aims to produce hard mixed examples to challenge the target classifier, while the target classifier's aim is to learn robust features from hard mixed examples to improve generalization. To prevent the collapse of the inherent meanings of images, we further introduce an exponential moving average (EMA) teacher and cosine similarity to train AdAutomixup in an end-to-end way. Extensive experiments on seven image benchmarks consistently prove that our approach outperforms the state of the art in various classification scenarios. The source code is available at https://github.com/JinXins/Adversarial-AutoMixup.

Huafeng Qin, Xin Jin, Yun Jiang, Mounim A. El-Yacoubi, Xinbo Gao• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100--
691
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100
Accuracy81.55
375
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100--
362
Fine-grained Image ClassificationStanford Cars
Accuracy91.38
298
Image ClassificationImageNet-1K
Top-1 Accuracy78.04
157
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100-C
Accuracy (Corruption)51.44
137
Fine grained classificationStanford Cars
Accuracy91.59
96
Fine-grained Image ClassificationCUB-200
Accuracy (All)88.76
53
Image ClassificationTiny-ImageNet
Top-1 Accuracy72.89
25
Fine-grained visual classificationCaltech Birds-200
Top-1 Accuracy84.57
22
Showing 10 of 13 rows

Other info

Follow for update