Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Alleviating Hallucinations of Large Language Models through Induced Hallucinations

About

Despite their impressive capabilities, large language models (LLMs) have been observed to generate responses that include inaccurate or fabricated information, a phenomenon commonly known as ``hallucination''. In this work, we propose a simple \textit{Induce-then-Contrast} Decoding (ICD) strategy to alleviate hallucinations. We first construct a factually weak LLM by inducing hallucinations from the original LLMs. Then, we penalize these induced hallucinations during decoding to enhance the factuality of the generated content. Concretely, we determine the final next-token predictions by amplifying the predictions from the original model and downplaying the induced untruthful predictions via contrastive decoding. Experimental results on both discrimination-based and generation-based hallucination evaluation benchmarks, such as TruthfulQA and \textsc{FActScore}, demonstrate that our proposed ICD methods can effectively enhance the factuality of LLMs across various model sizes and families. For example, when equipped with ICD, Llama2-7B-Chat and Mistral-7B-Instruct achieve performance comparable to ChatGPT and GPT4 on TruthfulQA, respectively.

Yue Zhang, Leyang Cui, Wei Bi, Shuming Shi• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Object Hallucination EvaluationPOPE--
2019
Visual Question AnsweringVizWiz
Accuracy46.9
1820
Question AnsweringSQuAD 2.0--
215
Multiple-ChoiceTruthfulQA
MC1 Accuracy46.32
83
Multimodal ConversationLLaVA-Bench Wild
Score69.7
78
Question AnsweringTruthfulQA--
73
Question AnsweringTruthfulQA MC1
MC1 Accuracy46.32
54
Visual Question AnsweringScienceQA (SQA)
SQA Accuracy62.8
43
Visual Question AnsweringMM-Vet
MM-Vet ASR Accuracy30.4
33
Truthfulness EvaluationTruthfulQA (test)
MC137.87
30
Showing 10 of 16 rows

Other info

Follow for update