Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preference

About

Large Language Models (LLMs) have unlocked new capabilities and applications; however, evaluating the alignment with human preferences still poses significant challenges. To address this issue, we introduce Chatbot Arena, an open platform for evaluating LLMs based on human preferences. Our methodology employs a pairwise comparison approach and leverages input from a diverse user base through crowdsourcing. The platform has been operational for several months, amassing over 240K votes. This paper describes the platform, analyzes the data we have collected so far, and explains the tried-and-true statistical methods we are using for efficient and accurate evaluation and ranking of models. We confirm that the crowdsourced questions are sufficiently diverse and discriminating and that the crowdsourced human votes are in good agreement with those of expert raters. These analyses collectively establish a robust foundation for the credibility of Chatbot Arena. Because of its unique value and openness, Chatbot Arena has emerged as one of the most referenced LLM leaderboards, widely cited by leading LLM developers and companies. Our demo is publicly available at \url{https://chat.lmsys.org}.

Wei-Lin Chiang, Lianmin Zheng, Ying Sheng, Anastasios Nikolas Angelopoulos, Tianle Li, Dacheng Li, Hao Zhang, Banghua Zhu, Michael Jordan, Joseph E. Gonzalez, Ion Stoica• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
LLM EvaluationShared (evaluation)
Tie-aware Accuracy27
10
LLM RankingLMArena-based simulation
Top-8 Ranked Candidates-2.5
9
Multi-objective preference selectionOpenAI models Setup A4: K=5, M*=5
Cost ($)0.073
8
Multi-objective preference selectionOpenAI models Setup A2: K=7, M*=10
Cost ($)0.046
8
Multi-objective preference selectionOpenAI models Setup A1: K=5, M*=2
Cost ($)0.115
8
Multi-objective preference selectionOpenAI models Setup A3: K=9, M*=2
Cost ($)0.125
8
Discriminative Sensitivitymicro-perturbed pair dataset
Win Rate27.8
4
Clinical Intent AlignmentHealthBench
CIA19.66
3
LLM Selection17-model zoo diverse providers
Cost ($)0.045
3
Showing 9 of 9 rows

Other info

Follow for update