Generalized Large-Scale Data Condensation via Various Backbone and Statistical Matching
About
The lightweight "local-match-global" matching introduced by SRe2L successfully creates a distilled dataset with comprehensive information on the full 224x224 ImageNet-1k. However, this one-sided approach is limited to a particular backbone, layer, and statistics, which limits the improvement of the generalization of a distilled dataset. We suggest that sufficient and various "local-match-global" matching are more precise and effective than a single one and has the ability to create a distilled dataset with richer information and better generalization. We call this perspective "generalized matching" and propose Generalized Various Backbone and Statistical Matching (G-VBSM) in this work, which aims to create a synthetic dataset with densities, ensuring consistency with the complete dataset across various backbones, layers, and statistics. As experimentally demonstrated, G-VBSM is the first algorithm to obtain strong performance across both small-scale and large-scale datasets. Specifically, G-VBSM achieves a performance of 38.7% on CIFAR-100 with 128-width ConvNet, 47.6% on Tiny-ImageNet with ResNet18, and 31.4% on the full 224x224 ImageNet-1k with ResNet18, under images per class (IPC) 10, 50, and 10, respectively. These results surpass all SOTA methods by margins of 3.9%, 6.5%, and 10.1%, respectively.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 (test) | Accuracy45.7 | 3518 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 (test) | Accuracy55.6 | 3381 | |
| Image Classification | ImageNet-1K | Top-1 Acc63.7 | 836 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 | -- | 507 | |
| Classification | CIFAR10 (test) | Accuracy54.3 | 266 | |
| Image Classification | ImageNet-1k (val) | Accuracy31.4 | 189 | |
| Image Classification | Tiny-ImageNet | Top-1 Accuracy52.3 | 143 | |
| Classification | CIFAR-100 (test) | Accuracy45.7 | 129 | |
| Dataset Distillation | ImageNet-1k (val) | Accuracy63.7 | 64 | |
| Image Classification | ImageNette (test) | Accuracy81.4 | 45 |