Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Multi-Modal Hallucination Control by Visual Information Grounding

About

Generative Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are prone to generate plausible-sounding textual answers that, however, are not always grounded in the input image. We investigate this phenomenon, usually referred to as "hallucination" and show that it stems from an excessive reliance on the language prior. In particular, we show that as more tokens are generated, the reliance on the visual prompt decreases, and this behavior strongly correlates with the emergence of hallucinations. To reduce hallucinations, we introduce Multi-Modal Mutual-Information Decoding (M3ID), a new sampling method for prompt amplification. M3ID amplifies the influence of the reference image over the language prior, hence favoring the generation of tokens with higher mutual information with the visual prompt. M3ID can be applied to any pre-trained autoregressive VLM at inference time without necessitating further training and with minimal computational overhead. If training is an option, we show that M3ID can be paired with Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to improve the model's reliance on the prompt image without requiring any labels. Our empirical findings show that our algorithms maintain the fluency and linguistic capabilities of pre-trained VLMs while reducing hallucinations by mitigating visually ungrounded answers. Specifically, for the LLaVA 13B model, M3ID and M3ID+DPO reduce the percentage of hallucinated objects in captioning tasks by 25% and 28%, respectively, and improve the accuracy on VQA benchmarks such as POPE by 21% and 24%.

Alessandro Favero, Luca Zancato, Matthew Trager, Siddharth Choudhary, Pramuditha Perera, Alessandro Achille, Ashwin Swaminathan, Stefano Soatto• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Object Hallucination EvaluationPOPE--
2019
Hallucination EvaluationCHAIR
CHAIR_s72.8
393
Multimodal Capability EvaluationMM-Vet
Score49.72
393
Object HallucinationPOPE Popular
F1 Score87.75
372
Visual Mathematical ReasoningMathVista
Accuracy52
366
Object HallucinationPOPE Adversarial
Accuracy87.1
353
Visual Question AnsweringVQA v2
Accuracy70.33
333
Object HallucinationPOPE (Random)
F1 Score88.94
324
Hallucination EvaluationMMHal-Bench
MMHal Score2.83
306
Hallucination EvaluationAMBER
CHAIR12.4
222
Showing 10 of 102 rows
...

Other info

Follow for update