Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

OpenMoE: An Early Effort on Open Mixture-of-Experts Language Models

About

To help the open-source community have a better understanding of Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) based large language models (LLMs), we train and release OpenMoE, a series of fully open-sourced and reproducible decoder-only MoE LLMs, ranging from 650M to 34B parameters and trained on up to over 1T tokens. Our investigation confirms that MoE-based LLMs can offer a more favorable cost-effectiveness trade-off than dense LLMs, highlighting the potential effectiveness for future LLM development. One more important contribution of this study is an in-depth analysis of the routing mechanisms within our OpenMoE models, leading to three significant findings: Context-Independent Specialization, Early Routing Learning, and Drop-towards-the-End. We discovered that routing decisions in MoE models are predominantly based on token IDs, with minimal context relevance. The token-to-expert assignments are determined early in the pre-training phase and remain largely unchanged. This imperfect routing can result in performance degradation, particularly in sequential tasks like multi-turn conversations, where tokens appearing later in a sequence are more likely to be dropped. Finally, we rethink our design based on the above-mentioned observations and analysis. To facilitate future MoE LLM development, we propose potential strategies for mitigating the issues we found and further improving off-the-shelf MoE LLM designs.

Fuzhao Xue, Zian Zheng, Yao Fu, Jinjie Ni, Zangwei Zheng, Wangchunshu Zhou, Yang You• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Commonsense ReasoningWinoGrande
Accuracy60.3
1085
Question AnsweringARC Challenge
Accuracy30.3
906
Multi-task Language UnderstandingMMLU
Accuracy26.2
876
Commonsense ReasoningPIQA
Accuracy74.2
751
Question AnsweringARC Easy
Normalized Acc64.1
389
Science Question AnsweringARC Challenge
Accuracy30.3
342
Physical Interaction Question AnsweringPIQA
Accuracy65.7
333
Boolean Question AnsweringBoolQ
Accuracy61.2
323
Common Sense ReasoningHellaSwag
Accuracy45.5
213
Science Question AnsweringARC-E
Accuracy64.1
184
Showing 10 of 14 rows

Other info

Follow for update