Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning

About

In the realm of Large Language Models (LLMs), the balance between instruction data quality and quantity is a focal point. Recognizing this, we introduce a self-guided methodology for LLMs to autonomously discern and select cherry samples from open-source datasets, effectively minimizing manual curation and potential cost for instruction tuning an LLM. Our key innovation, the Instruction-Following Difficulty (IFD) metric, emerges as a pivotal metric to identify discrepancies between a model's expected responses and its intrinsic generation capability. Through the application of IFD, cherry samples can be pinpointed, leading to a marked uptick in model training efficiency. Empirical validations on datasets like Alpaca and WizardLM underpin our findings; with a mere $10\%$ of original data input, our strategy showcases improved results. This synthesis of self-guided cherry-picking and the IFD metric signifies a transformative leap in the instruction tuning of LLMs, promising both efficiency and resource-conscious advancements. Codes, data, and models are available: https://github.com/tianyi-lab/Cherry_LLM

Ming Li, Yong Zhang, Zhitao Li, Jiuhai Chen, Lichang Chen, Ning Cheng, Jianzong Wang, Tianyi Zhou, Jing Xiao• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Language ModelingWikiText2
Perplexity10.17
3785
Language ModelingWikiText-2 (test)
PPL18.54
2333
Language ModelingWikiText-2
Perplexity (PPL)13.51
2320
Object Hallucination EvaluationPOPE
Accuracy82.6
2019
Commonsense ReasoningHellaSwag
Accuracy75.59
1896
Visual Question AnsweringTextVQA
Accuracy51.8
1453
Commonsense ReasoningWinoGrande
Accuracy68.63
1442
Visual Question AnsweringVQA v2
Accuracy74
1429
Language ModelingPTB
Perplexity19.31
1234
Text-based Visual Question AnsweringTextVQA
Accuracy51.8
962
Showing 10 of 160 rows
...

Other info

Follow for update