Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

PracticalDG: Perturbation Distillation on Vision-Language Models for Hybrid Domain Generalization

About

Domain Generalization (DG) aims to resolve distribution shifts between source and target domains, and current DG methods are default to the setting that data from source and target domains share identical categories. Nevertheless, there exists unseen classes from target domains in practical scenarios. To address this issue, Open Set Domain Generalization (OSDG) has emerged and several methods have been exclusively proposed. However, most existing methods adopt complex architectures with slight improvement compared with DG methods. Recently, vision-language models (VLMs) have been introduced in DG following the fine-tuning paradigm, but consume huge training overhead with large vision models. Therefore, in this paper, we innovate to transfer knowledge from VLMs to lightweight vision models and improve the robustness by introducing Perturbation Distillation (PD) from three perspectives, including Score, Class and Instance (SCI), named SCI-PD. Moreover, previous methods are oriented by the benchmarks with identical and fixed splits, ignoring the divergence between source domains. These methods are revealed to suffer from sharp performance decay with our proposed new benchmark Hybrid Domain Generalization (HDG) and a novel metric $H^{2}$-CV, which construct various splits to comprehensively assess the robustness of algorithms. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms on multiple datasets, especially improving the robustness when confronting data scarcity.

Zining Chen, Weiqiu Wang, Zhicheng Zhao, Fei Su, Aidong Men, Hongying Meng• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Open Domain GeneralizationOfficeHome
Acc63.66
43
Open Set Domain GeneralizationOfficeHome H=1
Accuracy68.08
23
Open Set Domain GeneralizationOfficeHome H=1/6
Accuracy58.25
12
Open Set Domain GeneralizationOfficeHome Average
Accuracy61.73
12
Open Set Domain GeneralizationPACS
Accuracy (H=1)85.25
12
Low-Shot Open-Set Domain GeneralizationPACS 1-shot
Acc23.4
11
Low-Shot Open-Set Domain GeneralizationVLCS 5-shot
Accuracy34.53
11
Low-Shot Open-Set Domain GeneralizationVLCS 1-shot
Acc19.88
11
Low-Shot Open-Set Domain GeneralizationPACS 5-shot
Accuracy35.16
11
Open Set Domain GeneralizationDomainNet (test)
Accuracy (H=0)25.28
6
Showing 10 of 10 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update