Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

RemoteCLIP: A Vision Language Foundation Model for Remote Sensing

About

General-purpose foundation models have led to recent breakthroughs in artificial intelligence. In remote sensing, self-supervised learning (SSL) and Masked Image Modeling (MIM) have been adopted to build foundation models. However, these models primarily learn low-level features and require annotated data for fine-tuning. Moreover, they are inapplicable for retrieval and zero-shot applications due to the lack of language understanding. To address these limitations, we propose RemoteCLIP, the first vision-language foundation model for remote sensing that aims to learn robust visual features with rich semantics and aligned text embeddings for seamless downstream application. To address the scarcity of pre-training data, we leverage data scaling which converts heterogeneous annotations into a unified image-caption data format based on Box-to-Caption (B2C) and Mask-to-Box (M2B) conversion. By further incorporating UAV imagery, we produce a 12 $\times$ larger pretraining dataset than the combination of all available datasets. RemoteCLIP can be applied to a variety of downstream tasks, including zero-shot image classification, linear probing, $\textit{k}$-NN classification, few-shot classification, image-text retrieval, and object counting in remote sensing images. Evaluation on 16 datasets, including a newly introduced RemoteCount benchmark to test the object counting ability, shows that RemoteCLIP consistently outperforms baseline foundation models across different model scales. Impressively, RemoteCLIP beats the state-of-the-art method by 9.14% mean recall on the RSITMD dataset and 8.92% on the RSICD dataset. For zero-shot classification, our RemoteCLIP outperforms the CLIP baseline by up to 6.39% average accuracy on 12 downstream datasets. Project website: https://github.com/ChenDelong1999/RemoteCLIP

Fan Liu, Delong Chen, Zhangqingyun Guan, Xiaocong Zhou, Jiale Zhu, Qiaolin Ye, Liyong Fu, Jun Zhou• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationEuroSAT
Accuracy59.94
497
Image ClassificationRESISC45
Accuracy79.84
263
Image ClassificationEuroSAT
Accuracy46.04
83
Image-to-Text RetrievalRSITMD (test)
R@127.88
61
Text-to-Image RetrievalRSITMD (test)
R@122.17
61
Text RetrievalRSICD (test)
R@117.02
51
Scene ClassificationAID
Top-1 Acc71.75
47
Image ClassificationWHU-RS19
Accuracy96.12
45
ClassificationAID (test)
Top-1 Accuracy91.3
41
Text-to-Image RetrievalRSICD (test)
R@113.71
34
Showing 10 of 57 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update