Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Incremental Residual Concept Bottleneck Models

About

Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) map the black-box visual representations extracted by deep neural networks onto a set of interpretable concepts and use the concepts to make predictions, enhancing the transparency of the decision-making process. Multimodal pre-trained models can match visual representations with textual concept embeddings, allowing for obtaining the interpretable concept bottleneck without the expertise concept annotations. Recent research has focused on the concept bank establishment and the high-quality concept selection. However, it is challenging to construct a comprehensive concept bank through humans or large language models, which severely limits the performance of CBMs. In this work, we propose the Incremental Residual Concept Bottleneck Model (Res-CBM) to address the challenge of concept completeness. Specifically, the residual concept bottleneck model employs a set of optimizable vectors to complete missing concepts, then the incremental concept discovery module converts the complemented vectors with unclear meanings into potential concepts in the candidate concept bank. Our approach can be applied to any user-defined concept bank, as a post-hoc processing method to enhance the performance of any CBMs. Furthermore, to measure the descriptive efficiency of CBMs, the Concept Utilization Efficiency (CUE) metric is proposed. Experiments show that the Res-CBM outperforms the current state-of-the-art methods in terms of both accuracy and efficiency and achieves comparable performance to black-box models across multiple datasets.

Chenming Shang, Shiji Zhou, Hengyuan Zhang, Xinzhe Ni, Yujiu Yang, Yuwang Wang• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 (test)
Accuracy67.91
3518
Image ClassificationFood-101
Accuracy89.8
494
Image ClassificationFlowers102
Accuracy93.8
478
Image ClassificationFood101
Accuracy79.3
309
Image ClassificationImageNet (test)
Top-1 Accuracy82.98
291
Image ClassificationRESISC45--
263
Image ClassificationCUB-200 2011
Accuracy75.8
257
Image ClassificationCIFAR100 (test)
Accuracy83.01
206
Image ClassificationDTD (test)
Accuracy75.77
181
Image ClassificationOxford Flowers 102--
172
Showing 10 of 32 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update