RBF-PINN: Non-Fourier Positional Embedding in Physics-Informed Neural Networks
About
While many recent Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) variants have had considerable success in solving Partial Differential Equations, the empirical benefits of feature mapping drawn from the broader Neural Representations research have been largely overlooked. We highlight the limitations of widely used Fourier-based feature mapping in certain situations and suggest the use of the conditionally positive definite Radial Basis Function. The empirical findings demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach across a variety of forward and inverse problem cases. Our method can be seamlessly integrated into coordinate-based input neural networks and contribute to the wider field of PINNs research.
Chengxi Zeng, Tilo Burghardt, Alberto M Gambaruto• 2024
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDE solving | Navier-Stokes | Relative L2 Loss2.56 | 47 | |
| PDE solving | Burgers | Relative L2 Error2.89e-4 | 33 | |
| PDE solving | Allen-Cahn equation | L2 Relative Error9.89e-5 | 25 | |
| PDE solving | Diffusion PDE | Relative L2 Error8.67e-5 | 24 | |
| PDE solving | Heat PDE | Relative L2 Error0.0578 | 24 | |
| PDE solving | Reaction PDE | Relative L2 Error0.975 | 16 | |
| PDE solving | Wave | Relative L2 Error0.0213 | 16 | |
| PDE solving | Convection | Relative L2 Error0.702 | 14 | |
| PDE solving | Wave PDE | Relative L2 Error0.0093 | 11 | |
| PDE solving | Non-homogeneous heat equation | L2 Relative Error3.06 | 8 |
Showing 10 of 12 rows