Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Variational Linearized Laplace Approximation for Bayesian Deep Learning

About

The Linearized Laplace Approximation (LLA) has been recently used to perform uncertainty estimation on the predictions of pre-trained deep neural networks (DNNs). However, its widespread application is hindered by significant computational costs, particularly in scenarios with a large number of training points or DNN parameters. Consequently, additional approximations of LLA, such as Kronecker-factored or diagonal approximate GGN matrices, are utilized, potentially compromising the model's performance. To address these challenges, we propose a new method for approximating LLA using a variational sparse Gaussian Process (GP). Our method is based on the dual RKHS formulation of GPs and retains, as the predictive mean, the output of the original DNN. Furthermore, it allows for efficient stochastic optimization, which results in sub-linear training time in the size of the training dataset. Specifically, its training cost is independent of the number of training points. We compare our proposed method against accelerated LLA (ELLA), which relies on the Nystr\"om approximation, as well as other LLA variants employing the sample-then-optimize principle. Experimental results, both on regression and classification datasets, show that our method outperforms these already existing efficient variants of LLA, both in terms of the quality of the predictive distribution and in terms of total computational time.

Luis A. Ortega, Sim\'on Rodr\'iguez Santana, Daniel Hern\'andez-Lobato• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationFashionMNIST (test)
Accuracy86.7
218
Out-of-Distribution DetectionCIFAR-10
AUROC96
36
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10
Accuracy0.942
36
OOD DetectionCIFAR-10
OOD AUROC0.96
24
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10
NLL0.187
24
RegressionAirline
NLL4.963
22
Out-of-Distribution DetectionKMNIST (test)
AUROC0.677
22
Classification and Uncertainty QuantificationMNIST (test)
Accuracy97.8
15
Uncertainty QuantificationCIFAR-10 (test)
Accuracy93.2
14
Image ClassificationMNIST
Acc97.9
13
Showing 10 of 17 rows

Other info

Follow for update