Leader Reward for POMO-Based Neural Combinatorial Optimization
About
Deep neural networks based on reinforcement learning (RL) for solving combinatorial optimization (CO) problems are developing rapidly and have shown a tendency to approach or even outperform traditional solvers. However, existing methods overlook an important distinction: CO problems differ from other traditional problems in that they focus solely on the optimal solution provided by the model within a specific length of time, rather than considering the overall quality of all solutions generated by the model. In this paper, we propose Leader Reward and apply it during two different training phases of the Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima (POMO) model to enhance the model's ability to generate optimal solutions. This approach is applicable to a variety of CO problems, such as the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP), the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP), and the Flexible Flow Shop Problem (FFSP), but also works well with other POMO-based models or inference phase's strategies. We demonstrate that Leader Reward greatly improves the quality of the optimal solutions generated by the model. Specifically, we reduce the POMO's gap to the optimum by more than 100 times on TSP100 with almost no additional computational overhead.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem | CVRPLib | Optimality Gap1.19 | 66 | |
| Traveling Salesman Problem | TSPLib All Instances (N < 250) | Optimality Gap0.00e+0 | 66 | |
| Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) | TSP n=100 10K instances (test) | Objective Value7.765 | 64 | |
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem | CVRP N=100 10,000 instances (test) | Objective Value15.579 | 56 | |
| Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) | TSP n=150 Generalization 1K instances | Objective Value9.346 | 37 | |
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem | CVRP n=150 1k instances | Objective Value19.126 | 29 | |
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP) | CVRP n=200 Generalization 1K instances | Objective Value21.966 | 23 | |
| Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) | TSP n=200 Generalization 1K instances | Objective Value10.695 | 21 | |
| Flexible Flow Shop Problem | FFSP20 1K instances 1.0 (test) | Cost24.169 | 11 | |
| Flexible Flow Shop Problem | FFSP50 1K instances 1.0 (test) | Cost48.241 | 9 |