Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Meta-Reasoning: Semantics-Symbol Deconstruction for Large Language Models

About

Neural-symbolic methods have demonstrated efficiency in enhancing the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs). However, existing methods mainly rely on syntactically mapping natural languages to complete formal languages like Python and SQL. Those methods require that reasoning tasks be convertible into programs, which cater to the computer execution mindset and deviate from human reasoning habits. To broaden symbolic methods' applicability and adaptability in the real world, we propose the Meta-Reasoning from a linguistic perspective. This method empowers LLMs to deconstruct reasoning-independent semantic information into generic symbolic representations, thereby efficiently capturing more generalized reasoning knowledge. We conduct extensive experiments on more than ten datasets encompassing conventional reasoning tasks like arithmetic, symbolic, and logical reasoning, and the more complex interactive reasoning tasks like theory-of-mind reasoning. Experimental results demonstrate that Meta-Reasoning significantly enhances in-context reasoning accuracy, learning efficiency, out-of-domain generalization, and output stability compared to the Chain-of-Thought technique. Code and data are publicly available at \url{https://github.com/Alsace08/Meta-Reasoning}.

Yiming Wang, Zhuosheng Zhang, Pei Zhang, Baosong Yang, Rui Wang• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Arithmetic ReasoningMultiArith
Accuracy98.7
229
Arithmetic ReasoningADDSUB
Accuracy98
123
Symbolic ReasoningLetter
Accuracy92.4
67
Symbolic ReasoningCOIN
Accuracy100
45
Logical reasoningTrack
Track(Avg)100
12
Symbolic ReasoningLies
Accuracy100
12
Showing 6 of 6 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update