Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Peering into the Mind of Language Models: An Approach for Attribution in Contextual Question Answering

About

With the enhancement in the field of generative artificial intelligence (AI), contextual question answering has become extremely relevant. Attributing model generations to the input source document is essential to ensure trustworthiness and reliability. We observe that when large language models (LLMs) are used for contextual question answering, the output answer often consists of text copied verbatim from the input prompt which is linked together with "glue text" generated by the LLM. Motivated by this, we propose that LLMs have an inherent awareness from where the text was copied, likely captured in the hidden states of the LLM. We introduce a novel method for attribution in contextual question answering, leveraging the hidden state representations of LLMs. Our approach bypasses the need for extensive model retraining and retrieval model overhead, offering granular attributions and preserving the quality of generated answers. Our experimental results demonstrate that our method performs on par or better than GPT-4 at identifying verbatim copied segments in LLM generations and in attributing these segments to their source. Importantly, our method shows robust performance across various LLM architectures, highlighting its broad applicability. Additionally, we present Verifiability-granular, an attribution dataset which has token level annotations for LLM generations in the contextual question answering setup.

Anirudh Phukan, Shwetha Somasundaram, Apoorv Saxena, Koustava Goswami, Balaji Vasan Srinivasan• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
AttributionVerifiability-Granular (test)
Attribution Accuracy77.71
28
AttributionQuoteSum (test)
Accuracy89.95
18
Fine-grained attributionQuoteSum
Accuracy90.6
11
Sentence-level attributionELI5 (test)
Citation Recall24.5
10
Sentence-level attributionASQA (test)
Citation Recall35
10
AttributionKV Retrieval (test)
Accuracy0.9098
9
Context AttributionCNN Dailymail (1000 examples)
Log Probability Drop0.72
9
Token-level identification of extractive spansQuoteSum (test)
Precision96
6
Token-level identification of extractive spansVerifiability-Granular (test)
Precision73
5
Showing 9 of 9 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update