Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Less is More: Mitigating Multimodal Hallucination from an EOS Decision Perspective

About

Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) often suffer from multimodal hallucinations, wherein they may create content that is not present in the visual inputs. In this paper, we explore a new angle of this issue: overly detailed training data hinders the model's ability to timely terminate generation, leading to continued outputs beyond visual perception limits. By investigating how the model decides to terminate generation with EOS, the special end-of-sentence token, we find that the model assesses the completeness of the entire sequence by comparing the generated text with the image. This observation suggests that the model possesses an inherent potential of making proper EOS decisions based on its visual perception to avoid overly lengthy outputs. To take advantage of such potential, we explore two methods to mitigate multimodal hallucinations: a training objective that enables the model to reduce hallucinations by learning from regular instruction data, and a data filtering strategy to prevent harmful training data from exacerbating model hallucinations. Both methods significantly improve the hallucination performance of LMMs, without requiring any additional data or knowledge.

Zihao Yue, Liang Zhang, Qin Jin• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Hallucination EvaluationMMHal-Bench
MMHal Score2.33
174
Hallucination EvaluationAMBER
F1 Score75.8
71
Hallucination assessmentObject-HalBench
Mention Hallucination Rate17.8
39
Generative HallucinationObject-HalBench
CHAIR_S Score40.3
33
Generative HallucinationAMBER Generative
CHAIR Score5.1
24
Free-format Multimodal Hallucination AssessmentRefoMB (dev)
Trust51.1
20
Hallucination assessmentMHumanEval
Response Rate63.7
20
Multimodal Capability EvaluationMM-Star
Average Score32.9
18
Image CaptioningMSCOCO 500-sample subset (val)
Caption Length79
18
Showing 9 of 9 rows

Other info

Follow for update