Combinatorial Optimization with Policy Adaptation using Latent Space Search
About
Combinatorial Optimization underpins many real-world applications and yet, designing performant algorithms to solve these complex, typically NP-hard, problems remains a significant research challenge. Reinforcement Learning (RL) provides a versatile framework for designing heuristics across a broad spectrum of problem domains. However, despite notable progress, RL has not yet supplanted industrial solvers as the go-to solution. Current approaches emphasize pre-training heuristics that construct solutions but often rely on search procedures with limited variance, such as stochastically sampling numerous solutions from a single policy or employing computationally expensive fine-tuning of the policy on individual problem instances. Building on the intuition that performant search at inference time should be anticipated during pre-training, we propose COMPASS, a novel RL approach that parameterizes a distribution of diverse and specialized policies conditioned on a continuous latent space. We evaluate COMPASS across three canonical problems - Travelling Salesman, Capacitated Vehicle Routing, and Job-Shop Scheduling - and demonstrate that our search strategy (i) outperforms state-of-the-art approaches on 11 standard benchmarking tasks and (ii) generalizes better, surpassing all other approaches on a set of 18 procedurally transformed instance distributions.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Math Reasoning | AMC | Accuracy6.8 | 95 | |
| Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) | TSP n=100 10K instances (test) | Objective Value7.765 | 64 | |
| Math Reasoning | MATH 500 | Accuracy17 | 60 | |
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem | CVRP procedurally transformed instances Mu-transformed (test) | Objective Value13.534 | 56 | |
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem | CVRP N=100 10,000 instances (test) | Objective Value15.594 | 56 | |
| Traveling Salesman Problem | TSP procedurally transformed instances Mu 0-9 (test) | Objective Value6.738 | 50 | |
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem | CVRP-200 | Objective Value22.455 | 43 | |
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem | CVRP n=125 (generalization) | Objective Value17.511 | 40 | |
| Traveling Salesman Problem | TSP-500 | Solution Length16.81 | 38 | |
| Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) | TSP n=150 Generalization 1K instances | Objective Value9.35 | 37 |