Faithful Chart Summarization with ChaTS-Pi
About
Chart-to-summary generation can help explore data, communicate insights, and help the visually impaired people. Multi-modal generative models have been used to produce fluent summaries, but they can suffer from factual and perceptual errors. In this work we present CHATS-CRITIC, a reference-free chart summarization metric for scoring faithfulness. CHATS-CRITIC is composed of an image-to-text model to recover the table from a chart, and a tabular entailment model applied to score the summary sentence by sentence. We find that CHATS-CRITIC evaluates the summary quality according to human ratings better than reference-based metrics, either learned or n-gram based, and can be further used to fix candidate summaries by removing not supported sentences. We then introduce CHATS-PI, a chart-to-summary pipeline that leverages CHATS-CRITIC during inference to fix and rank sampled candidates from any chart-summarization model. We evaluate CHATS-PI and CHATS-CRITIC using human raters, establishing state-of-the-art results on two popular chart-to-summary datasets.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Figure Captioning | SciCap First sentence | BLEU15.53 | 10 | |
| Figure Captioning | SciCap Single-Sent Caption | BLEU18 | 9 | |
| Figure Captioning | SciCap Caption w/ <=100 words | BLEU16.16 | 9 | |
| Sentence Classification | Chart-To-Text (test) | Accuracy92.38 | 8 | |
| Chart Summarization | SciCap First sentence | CHATS-CRITIC51.97 | 4 | |
| Figure Captioning | SciCap SciTune info | -- | 2 |