Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Merlin: A Vision Language Foundation Model for 3D Computed Tomography

About

Over 85 million computed tomography (CT) scans are performed annually in the US, of which approximately one quarter focus on the abdomen. Given the current radiologist shortage, there is a large impetus to use artificial intelligence to alleviate the burden of interpreting these complex imaging studies. Prior state-of-the-art approaches for automated medical image interpretation leverage vision language models (VLMs). However, current medical VLMs are generally limited to 2D images and short reports, and do not leverage electronic health record (EHR) data for supervision. We introduce Merlin - a 3D VLM that we train using paired CT scans (6+ million images from 15,331 CTs), EHR diagnosis codes (1.8+ million codes), and radiology reports (6+ million tokens). We evaluate Merlin on 6 task types and 752 individual tasks. The non-adapted (off-the-shelf) tasks include zero-shot findings classification (31 findings), phenotype classification (692 phenotypes), and zero-shot cross-modal retrieval (image to findings and image to impressions), while model adapted tasks include 5-year disease prediction (6 diseases), radiology report generation, and 3D semantic segmentation (20 organs). We perform internal validation on a test set of 5,137 CTs, and external validation on 7,000 clinical CTs and on two public CT datasets (VerSe, TotalSegmentator). Beyond these clinically-relevant evaluations, we assess the efficacy of various network architectures and training strategies to depict that Merlin has favorable performance to existing task-specific baselines. We derive data scaling laws to empirically assess training data needs for requisite downstream task performance. Furthermore, unlike conventional VLMs that require hundreds of GPUs for training, we perform all training on a single GPU.

Louis Blankemeier, Joseph Paul Cohen, Ashwin Kumar, Dave Van Veen, Syed Jamal Safdar Gardezi, Magdalini Paschali, Zhihong Chen, Jean-Benoit Delbrouck, Eduardo Reis, Cesar Truyts, Christian Bluethgen, Malte Engmann Kjeldskov Jensen, Sophie Ostmeier, Maya Varma, Jeya Maria Jose Valanarasu, Zhongnan Fang, Zepeng Huo, Zaid Nabulsi, Diego Ardila, Wei-Hung Weng, Edson Amaro Junior, Neera Ahuja, Jason Fries, Nigam H. Shah, Andrew Johnston, Robert D. Boutin, Andrew Wentland, Curtis P. Langlotz, Jason Hom, Sergios Gatidis, Akshay S. Chaudhari• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Alzheimer stage classificationADNI
AUC89.7
116
ClassificationRad-ChestCT
AUC70.91
25
Multi-label Abnormality AnalysisCT-RATE (test)
AUROC0.7785
20
AD diagnosisADNI (test)--
16
Binary Alzheimer's Disease Classification (CN vs. AD)OASIS (test)
AUC85.88
13
Binary Alzheimer's Disease Classification (CN vs. AD)AIBL (test)
AUC94.49
13
Chest ClassificationCT-RATE (internal test)
AUROC82.62
13
Tumor Segmentation and DetectionJHH Pancreas Tumor external (test)
DSC55
11
Tumor Segmentation and DetectionUCSF Pancreas Tumor internal (test)
F1 Score59
11
Tumor Segmentation and DetectionUCSF Kidney Tumor internal (test)
F1 Score64
11
Showing 10 of 37 rows

Other info

Follow for update