Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders

About

Sparse autoencoders provide a promising unsupervised approach for extracting interpretable features from a language model by reconstructing activations from a sparse bottleneck layer. Since language models learn many concepts, autoencoders need to be very large to recover all relevant features. However, studying the properties of autoencoder scaling is difficult due to the need to balance reconstruction and sparsity objectives and the presence of dead latents. We propose using k-sparse autoencoders [Makhzani and Frey, 2013] to directly control sparsity, simplifying tuning and improving the reconstruction-sparsity frontier. Additionally, we find modifications that result in few dead latents, even at the largest scales we tried. Using these techniques, we find clean scaling laws with respect to autoencoder size and sparsity. We also introduce several new metrics for evaluating feature quality based on the recovery of hypothesized features, the explainability of activation patterns, and the sparsity of downstream effects. These metrics all generally improve with autoencoder size. To demonstrate the scalability of our approach, we train a 16 million latent autoencoder on GPT-4 activations for 40 billion tokens. We release training code and autoencoders for open-source models, as well as a visualizer.

Leo Gao, Tom Dupr\'e la Tour, Henk Tillman, Gabriel Goh, Rajan Troll, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, Jan Leike, Jeffrey Wu• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100
Accuracy41.8
302
Misalignment DetectionTaylor
Accuracy94.3
63
Safe-or-harmful binary classificationBeavertails
Accuracy84.4
63
Multi-risk safety monitoringBeavertails
Accuracy (%)77.3
63
Concept Extraction Evaluation4 classification datasets average
RAcc98.47
35
Semantic Coherence EvaluationCOCO
HMS_med0.338
27
Multi-level Semantic Coherence EvaluationCOCO
HMSmean39.6
27
Semantic Coherence EvaluationiNaturalist
HMS_med28.7
27
Multi-level Semantic Coherence EvaluationiNaturalist
HMSmean32.5
27
Semantic Coherence EvaluationImageNet
HMS_med0.218
27
Showing 10 of 70 rows

Other info

Follow for update