Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

CAT: A Causally Graph Attention Network for Trimming Heterophilic Graph

About

Local Attention-guided Message Passing Mechanism (LAMP) adopted in Graph Attention Networks (GATs) is designed to adaptively learn the importance of neighboring nodes for better local aggregation on the graph, which can bring the representations of similar neighbors closer effectively, thus showing stronger discrimination ability. However, existing GATs suffer from a significant discrimination ability decline in heterophilic graphs because the high proportion of dissimilar neighbors can weaken the self-attention of the central node, jointly resulting in the deviation of the central node from similar nodes in the representation space. This kind of effect generated by neighboring nodes is called the Distraction Effect (DE) in this paper. To estimate and weaken the DE of neighboring nodes, we propose a Causally graph Attention network for Trimming heterophilic graph (CAT). To estimate the DE, since the DE are generated through two paths (grab the attention assigned to neighbors and reduce the self-attention of the central node), we use Total Effect to model DE, which is a kind of causal estimand and can be estimated from intervened data; To weaken the DE, we identify the neighbors with the highest DE (we call them Distraction Neighbors) and remove them. We adopt three representative GATs as the base model within the proposed CAT framework and conduct experiments on seven heterophilic datasets in three different sizes. Comparative experiments show that CAT can improve the node classification accuracy of all base GAT models. Ablation experiments and visualization further validate the enhancement of discrimination ability brought by CAT. The source code is available at https://github.com/GeoX-Lab/CAT.

Silu He, Qinyao Luo, Xinsha Fu, Ling Zhao, Ronghua Du, Haifeng Li• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Node ClassificationChameleon
Accuracy69.9
549
Node ClassificationSquirrel
Accuracy59.3
500
Node ClassificationCornell
Accuracy88.8
426
Node ClassificationWisconsin
Accuracy85.6
410
Node ClassificationTexas
Accuracy0.833
410
Node ClassificationActor
Accuracy38.5
237
Node ClassificationRoman-Empire
Accuracy64.4
135
Showing 7 of 7 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update