Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Shortened LLaMA: Depth Pruning for Large Language Models with Comparison of Retraining Methods

About

Structured pruning of modern large language models (LLMs) has emerged as a way of decreasing their high computational needs. Width pruning reduces the size of projection weight matrices (e.g., by removing attention heads) while maintaining the number of layers. Depth pruning, in contrast, removes entire layers or blocks, while keeping the size of the remaining weights unchanged. Most current research focuses on either width-only or a blend of width and depth pruning, with little comparative analysis between the two units (width vs. depth) concerning their impact on LLM inference efficiency. In this work, we show that simple depth pruning can effectively compress LLMs while achieving comparable or superior performance to recent width pruning studies. Our pruning method boosts inference speeds, especially under memory-constrained conditions that require limited batch sizes for running LLMs, where width pruning is ineffective. In retraining pruned models for quality recovery, continued pretraining on a large corpus markedly outperforms LoRA-based tuning, particularly at severe pruning ratios. We hope this work can help build compact yet capable LLMs. Code and models can be found at: https://github.com/Nota-NetsPresso/shortened-llm

Bo-Kyeong Kim, Geonmin Kim, Tae-Ho Kim, Thibault Castells, Shinkook Choi, Junho Shin, Hyoung-Kyu Song• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Language ModelingWikiText2
Perplexity16.6515
2839
Language ModelingWikiText-2 (test)
PPL20.52
1949
Language ModelingC4
Perplexity13.8046
1422
Language ModelingPTB
Perplexity54.5982
1034
Video UnderstandingMVBench
Accuracy30
425
Video UnderstandingVideoMME
Overall Score32.3
222
Video UnderstandingEgoSchema--
158
Zero-shot EvaluationEight datasets average
Accuracy62.99
87
Zero-shot Common Sense ReasoningCommonsense Reasoning Benchmarks (BoolQ, PIQA, HellaSwag, WinoGrande, ARC-e, ARC-c, OBQA) zero-shot
Avg Accuracy63.316
63
Zero-shot ReasoningReasoning Tasks (BoolQ, PIQA, HellaSwag, WinoGrande, ARC-e, ARC-c, OBQA) Zero-shot
BoolQ Accuracy (Zero-shot)75.535
55
Showing 10 of 19 rows

Other info

Follow for update