Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

How to Learn More? Exploring Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks for Hyperspectral Image Classification

About

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and vision transformers (ViTs) have shown excellent capability in complex hyperspectral image (HSI) classification. However, these models require a significant number of training data and are computational resources. On the other hand, modern Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs) have demonstrated great classification capability. These modern MLP-based models require significantly less training data compared to CNNs and ViTs, achieving the state-of-the-art classification accuracy. Recently, Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) were proposed as viable alternatives for MLPs. Because of their internal similarity to splines and their external similarity to MLPs, KANs are able to optimize learned features with remarkable accuracy in addition to being able to learn new features. Thus, in this study, we assess the effectiveness of KANs for complex HSI data classification. Moreover, to enhance the HSI classification accuracy obtained by the KANs, we develop and propose a Hybrid architecture utilizing 1D, 2D, and 3D KANs. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed KAN architecture, we conducted extensive experiments on three newly created HSI benchmark datasets: QUH-Pingan, QUH-Tangdaowan, and QUH-Qingyun. The results underscored the competitive or better capability of the developed hybrid KAN-based model across these benchmark datasets over several other CNN- and ViT-based algorithms, including 1D-CNN, 2DCNN, 3D CNN, VGG-16, ResNet-50, EfficientNet, RNN, and ViT. The code are publicly available at (https://github.com/aj1365/HSIConvKAN)

Ali Jamali, Swalpa Kumar Roy, Danfeng Hong, Bing Lu, Pedram Ghamisi• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Hyperspectral Image ClassificationQingyun (test)
Overall Accuracy (OA)93.52
32
Hyperspectral Image ClassificationHouston (test)
Accuracy (Healthy Grass)80.34
19
Hyperspectral Image ClassificationPingan (test)
Accuracy (Ship)73.64
12
Hyperspectral Image ClassificationQUH-Tangdaowan (test)
Rubber Track Accuracy98.38
6
Showing 4 of 4 rows

Other info

Follow for update