Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Optimization Techniques for Unsupervised Complex Table Reasoning via Self-Training Framework

About

Structured tabular data is a fundamental data type in numerous fields, and the capacity to reason over tables is crucial for answering questions and validating hypotheses. However, constructing labeled data for complex reasoning tasks is labor intensive, and the quantity of annotated data remains insufficient to support the intricate demands of real-world applications. To address the insufficient annotation challenge, we present a self-training framework for unsupervised complex tabular reasoning (UCTR-ST) by generating diverse synthetic data with complex logic. Specifically, UCTR-ST incorporates several essential techniques: we aggregate diverse programs and execute them on tables based on a "Program-Management" component, and we bridge the gap between programs and text with a powerful "Program-Transformation" module that generates natural language sentences with complex logic. Furthermore, we optimize the procedure using a "Table-Text Manipulator" to handle joint table-text reasoning scenarios. The entire framework utilizes self-training techniques to leverage the unlabeled training data, which results in significant performance improvements when tested on real-world data. Experimental results demonstrate that UCTRST achieves above 90% of the supervised model performance on different tasks and domains, reducing the dependence on manual annotation. Additionally, our approach can serve as a data augmentation technique, significantly boosting the performance of supervised models in low-resourced domains.

Zhenyu Li, Xiuxing Li, Sunqi Fan, Jianyong Wang• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Table Question AnsweringWTQ
Accuracy8.84
101
Table Question AnsweringHiTab
Accuracy17.31
67
Table Question AnsweringTabMWP
Accuracy12.03
53
Table Question AnsweringAIT-QA
Accuracy35.76
41
Table-based Fact VerificationTabFact
Accuracy20.35
33
Table Question AnsweringTabMCQ
Accuracy20.96
24
Table ReasoningInfoTabs
Accuracy15.23
24
Table-to-text generationFeTaQA
Accuracy7.51
24
Tabular UnderstandingTableGPT
Accuracy17.61
24
Table SummarizationQTSumm
Accuracy7.09
24
Showing 10 of 10 rows

Other info

Follow for update