CLARA: Classifying and Disambiguating User Commands for Reliable Interactive Robotic Agents
About
In this paper, we focus on inferring whether the given user command is clear, ambiguous, or infeasible in the context of interactive robotic agents utilizing large language models (LLMs). To tackle this problem, we first present an uncertainty estimation method for LLMs to classify whether the command is certain (i.e., clear) or not (i.e., ambiguous or infeasible). Once the command is classified as uncertain, we further distinguish it between ambiguous or infeasible commands leveraging LLMs with situational aware context in a zero-shot manner. For ambiguous commands, we disambiguate the command by interacting with users via question generation with LLMs. We believe that proper recognition of the given commands could lead to a decrease in malfunction and undesired actions of the robot, enhancing the reliability of interactive robot agents. We present a dataset for robotic situational awareness, consisting pair of high-level commands, scene descriptions, and labels of command type (i.e., clear, ambiguous, or infeasible). We validate the proposed method on the collected dataset, pick-and-place tabletop simulation. Finally, we demonstrate the proposed approach in real-world human-robot interaction experiments, i.e., handover scenarios.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robotic Planning | LEMMA Single-Agent Multiplicity | Success Rate (SR)48 | 14 | |
| Robotic Planning | LEMMA Single-Agent Underspecified | Success Rate (SR)70 | 14 | |
| Robotic Planning | LEMMA Single-Agent Overall | Success Rate (SR)52 | 14 | |
| Robotic Planning | LEMMA Single-Agent Absence | Success Rate (SR)37 | 14 | |
| Robotic Planning | LEMMA Stack and Pass tasks, partially observed (test) | Success Rate45 | 8 | |
| Robotic Task Planning | LEMMA Single-agent | Calls per Episode10.36 | 4 |