WSI-VQA: Interpreting Whole Slide Images by Generative Visual Question Answering
About
Whole slide imaging is routinely adopted for carcinoma diagnosis and prognosis. Abundant experience is required for pathologists to achieve accurate and reliable diagnostic results of whole slide images (WSI). The huge size and heterogeneous features of WSIs make the workflow of pathological reading extremely time-consuming. In this paper, we propose a novel framework (WSI-VQA) to interpret WSIs by generative visual question answering. WSI-VQA shows universality by reframing various kinds of slide-level tasks in a question-answering pattern, in which pathologists can achieve immunohistochemical grading, survival prediction, and tumor subtyping following human-machine interaction. Furthermore, we establish a WSI-VQA dataset which contains 8672 slide-level question-answering pairs with 977 WSIs. Besides the ability to deal with different slide-level tasks, our generative model which is named Wsi2Text Transformer (W2T) outperforms existing discriminative models in medical correctness, which reveals the potential of our model to be applied in the clinical scenario. Additionally, we also visualize the co-attention mapping between word embeddings and WSIs as an intuitive explanation for diagnostic results. The dataset and related code are available at https://github.com/cpystan/WSI-VQA.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual Question Answering | WSI-VQA | Overall Accuracy46.9 | 43 | |
| Visual Question Answering | SlideBench-VQA BCNB | Overall11.3 | 37 | |
| Multiple Instance Learning Classification | Panda | Accuracy50.28 | 13 | |
| WSI Classification | PANDA Coarse-level | Accuracy70.17 | 13 | |
| WSI Classification | PANDA Fine-level | Accuracy (ACC)50.84 | 13 | |
| Multiple Instance Learning Classification | BRACS | Accuracy64.81 | 13 | |
| Computational Efficiency Analysis | Computational Efficiency | Trainable Parameters (M)23.96 | 13 | |
| WSI Classification | BRACS Fine-level | Accuracy64.81 | 13 | |
| Multiple Instance Learning Classification | GastWSI | Accuracy (%)56.74 | 13 | |
| WSI Classification | GastWSI Fine-level | Accuracy58.23 | 13 |