Bringing Masked Autoencoders Explicit Contrastive Properties for Point Cloud Self-Supervised Learning
About
Contrastive learning (CL) for Vision Transformers (ViTs) in image domains has achieved performance comparable to CL for traditional convolutional backbones. However, in 3D point cloud pretraining with ViTs, masked autoencoder (MAE) modeling remains dominant. This raises the question: Can we take the best of both worlds? To answer this question, we first empirically validate that integrating MAE-based point cloud pre-training with the standard contrastive learning paradigm, even with meticulous design, can lead to a decrease in performance. To address this limitation, we reintroduce CL into the MAE-based point cloud pre-training paradigm by leveraging the inherent contrastive properties of MAE. Specifically, rather than relying on extensive data augmentation as commonly used in the image domain, we randomly mask the input tokens twice to generate contrastive input pairs. Subsequently, a weight-sharing encoder and two identically structured decoders are utilized to perform masked token reconstruction. Additionally, we propose that for an input token masked by both masks simultaneously, the reconstructed features should be as similar as possible. This naturally establishes an explicit contrastive constraint within the generative MAE-based pre-training paradigm, resulting in our proposed method, Point-CMAE. Consequently, Point-CMAE effectively enhances the representation quality and transfer performance compared to its MAE counterpart. Experimental evaluations across various downstream applications, including classification, part segmentation, and few-shot learning, demonstrate the efficacy of our framework in surpassing state-of-the-art techniques under standard ViTs and single-modal settings. The source code and trained models are available at: https://github.com/Amazingren/Point-CMAE.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part Segmentation | ShapeNetPart (test) | -- | 312 | |
| Few-shot classification | ModelNet40 10-way 10-shot | Accuracy92.7 | 79 | |
| Few-shot classification | ModelNet40 10-way 20-shot | Accuracy95.3 | 79 | |
| Few-shot classification | ModelNet40 5-way 10-shot | Accuracy96.7 | 79 | |
| Few-shot classification | ModelNet40 5-way 20-shot | Accuracy98 | 79 | |
| 3D Object Classification | ModelNet40 1k P | Accuracy93.6 | 61 | |
| 3D Object Classification | ScanObjectNN PB_T50_RS (FULL Protocol) | Accuracy88.75 | 25 | |
| 3D Object Classification | ScanObjectNN OBJ_BG (FULL Protocol) | Accuracy93.46 | 23 | |
| 3D Object Classification | ScanObjectNN OBJ_ONLY FULL Protocol | Accuracy91.05 | 23 |