Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

FlexFL: Heterogeneous Federated Learning via APoZ-Guided Flexible Pruning in Uncertain Scenarios

About

Along with the increasing popularity of Deep Learning (DL) techniques, more and more Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) systems are adopting federated learning (FL) to enable privacy-aware collaborative learning among AIoT devices. However, due to the inherent data and device heterogeneity issues, existing FL-based AIoT systems suffer from the model selection problem. Although various heterogeneous FL methods have been investigated to enable collaborative training among heterogeneous models, there is still a lack of i) wise heterogeneous model generation methods for devices, ii) consideration of uncertain factors, and iii) performance guarantee for large models, thus strongly limiting the overall FL performance. To address the above issues, this paper introduces a novel heterogeneous FL framework named FlexFL. By adopting our Average Percentage of Zeros (APoZ)-guided flexible pruning strategy, FlexFL can effectively derive best-fit models for heterogeneous devices to explore their greatest potential. Meanwhile, our proposed adaptive local pruning strategy allows AIoT devices to prune their received models according to their varying resources within uncertain scenarios. Moreover, based on self-knowledge distillation, FlexFL can enhance the inference performance of large models by learning knowledge from small models. Comprehensive experimental results show that, compared to state-of-the-art heterogeneous FL methods, FlexFL can significantly improve the overall inference accuracy by up to 14.24%.

Zekai Chen, Chentao Jia, Ming Hu, Xiaofei Xie, Anran Li, Mingsong Chen• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationPACS
Overall Average Accuracy20.17
241
Image ClassificationDigits-Five
Accuracy (Source: mt)95.23
55
Human Activity RecognitionHAR Real-world Setting (test)
Accuracy76.24
11
Image ClassificationCIFAR10 Pathological Label Skew (test)
Accuracy85.13
11
Image ClassificationCIFAR100 Pathological Label Skew (test)
Accuracy49.21
11
Image ClassificationTinyImageNet Pathological Label Skew (test)
Accuracy22.23
11
Image ClassificationCIFAR10 Practical Label Skew Dirichlet (test)
Accuracy83.1
11
Image ClassificationCIFAR100 Practical Label Skew Dirichlet (test)
Accuracy35.27
11
Image ClassificationTinyImageNet Practical Label Skew Dirichlet (test)
Accuracy22.19
11
Text ClassificationAG News Real-world Setting (test)
Accuracy86.02
11
Showing 10 of 10 rows

Other info

Follow for update